Friday, September 08, 2006

Gathering for Sept. 10

Other than Albert Einstein, Neils Bohr is probably the best known physicist of the twentieth century (check the wikipedia link, he has awesome quotes). There is this story of a friend entering Bohr's office one day to notice there was a horseshoe hung above the door. The friend said, "what's this?" Bohr replied, "A lucky horseshoe." The friend said, "You are a physicist; surely you're not a superstitious person." Bohr said, "I'm not superstitious. However, I am led to believe that this horseshoe works whether you believe in it or not." Wow, that is like the best example of faith...even the faith that it takes to believe in something as radical as the Christmas or Easter. Faith acts independent of us, faith invites us in...invites us to believe and then sustains us to believe. I wanted to share this thought to add to last week's discussion...now on to this week's talk.
This Sunday we are continuing to discuss the resurrection. In a sense, if there is no resurrection there is no faith (both that which we believe and the power that enables us to believe it...the word faith can be understood in those two ways). Yet this Sunday I want us to consider something Christ resurrection is soon followed by his ascension. (do more later)

Monday, August 21, 2006

Gathering for August 27th


Coach Mike Krzyzewski... Yes, I realize that by opening with a reference to Coach K I just caused most of you to cruise to other blogs. Hear me out! Part of the Duke mentality that Coach K instills in his players is that they are part of something greater than themselves. I wonder if the same mentality rests in the heart of our faith. James Howell points out that in all the gospels' accounts of the resurrection it is never about us, but about something greater than us. In other words, the sentimental beliefs that the resurrection is just about you and I living forever or us being reunited with some lost loved ones both focuses too much on the self...it makes the resurrection about you and I...and not God. Howell asks us to consider what Coach K asks his players to consider, what if this thing, for our purposes the resurrection, is bigger than me? Seriously, what if the resurrection is God's way of saying, "I am God," "Jesus really is my son," or "in the end...I always win." This week, we'll talk begin to talk about the wonderful mystery that is the resurrection and what this event means.

Thursday, August 17, 2006

He Descended into Hell

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
There is a gray area that exists between popular myth and Biblical fact when we come to the subject of Hell. Most of our images/understanding of Hell comes from Dante (for those of you who didn't have to enjoy/endure him in High School, the link offers a Cliff Notes-like version of his vision of Hell...I found it interesting). Personally, my understanding of Hell is influenced by Scripture and C.S. Lewis' The Great Divorce. Still, popular myths aside, what are your thoughts on Hell? What is it? Where is it? Who is there? I want to spend some time this Sunday digging into what the Bible has to say about Hell.
Now, I want to turn my attention to the line in the Creed "he descended into Hell." Some of you may be wondering, "But, we don't say that line on Sundays!" You're correct, but some traditions do say it and it is in the earlier versions of the Apostles' Creed...so we're going to talk about it. Did you ever wonder what happens to those who die having never heard about Jesus or those who die having never met a Christian whose witness might have convinced them that there is a God? I think that this part of the Creed may give us a response to this and other similar questions. To get us into the topic for Sunday consider the following lines: "I have come seeking my wife. Love has led me here. I implore you, I beg you. Unite again the thread of her life. She will eventually be yours, but until then grant her back to me. But even if you deny me this request, know that I will not return without her. You shall have to triumph over both of us." Orpheus spoke these words to Pluto, god of the underworld, when he went to the depths of the Earth to reclaim his love, his wife Eurydice. Even the bonds of death could not stop his love. These long forgotten lines from Greek Mythology will serve nicely as we too venture into the underworld this week and discuss "he descended into hell." Is it possible that the bonds of death (ours) could not stop Christ's redemptive love? We'll talk about this Sunday...

Monday, July 31, 2006

Gathering for August 13

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
During my time at the Gothic Rockpile my understanding of theology was greatly shaped by the Black Church tradition. Within that tradition there is an interpretation of Triduum (Maundy Thursday evening, Good Friday and Holy Saturday combined) that has offered me much counsel, especially while I was serving in Great Britain. Summer and I lived in a predominantly Muslim neighborhood in the racially-tense city of Oldham. We were there on Sept. 11, 2001. It was a day when I understood all to well what Good Friday must have felt like...a day when unreal horror was all to real. It was a day when I felt I might know something about how the disciples felt when they stared at the Son of God on the cross. Both days were days marked by horror, disbelief, and uncertainty. Days marked by the constant question of "how could this happen?" leading to the question "what happens next?" My churches called to offer prayers. The local press called to ask for a statement. Great, I get to speak for all Americans! The reporter asked, "what do you have to say about this as an American?" First, I dismissed the adjective "American," I said that I preferred to respond as an individual since I couldn't possibly speak for all of America and that if I had to speak as part of a group I'd choose "Christ before Country." I then drew on the depth of the Black Church tradition's interpretation of Triduum. "At this point we come to a moment that can only be described as Good Friday. A day marked by disbelief and doubt. A day marked by horror and shock. A day marked by humanity's failure to be anything but humane. At this time, I, like much of the world, must endure this day for as long as it will last. I know worse is yet to come, for we will have to endure a time of uncertainty as we, as a world, endure Holy Saturday. Yet, for every Good Friday and Holy Saturday there will be a new dawn, another day, a day of resurrection and new life because following every Good Friday and Holy Saturday there is an Easter Sunday." I ended my comments at that point and hung up the phone. I was shocked when the openly anti-faith newspaper actually published my comment. I have offered that interpretation of Triduum to many a person when they were enduring a Good Friday and Holy Saturday time in their life. This week, oh yeah here's the link to our reading for this week, I want us to share our Good Friday and Holy Saturday times...those moments of darkness. I want us to share these times, anticipating the time when we speak about "and on the third day he rose again." I want us to share so that when we say that part of the Creed we might pause, even if only briefly, holding all those dark moments in our minds to then surrender them to the light of Easter. So post a story, a phrase, an image...whatever. I am really looking for this Sunday to be more of a time of worship as well as a discussion.

Friday, July 28, 2006

Gathering for July 30

"Greetings True Believers," to quote Stan Lee, I'm back from a blogging hiatus (read: a combination of business and much needed laziness). This Sunday's lesson presents two areas for conversation: faith's relationship to politics & the necessity of suffering. Here is this week's reading.
Faith and Politics: For all of our talk today about the seperation of Church and state or religion and politics, here we find Jesus dying at the hands of a politician (not even a powerful one!) and for political reasons (crucifixion was a death reserved only for enemies of the state, Rome). For some reason nowadays people wrongly make faith a private matter and politics a public one. Why do we have a privatized faith, a faith that is all about my relationship with the Lord (nothing wrong with this), but rarely speaks truth (meaning, speaks out against or challenges) to power?
Faith and Suffering: "You know what really grinds my gears," to quote that Family Guy Peter Griffin, is the current popularity of the Prosperity Gospel. What is the Posperity Gospel? Well, watch nearly any (insert your favorite popular preacher here) of (insert your favorite mega-church here) on your TV. These preachers usually present Christianity as a sound business proposition, "come to Jesus and you'll be richly rewarded..." Personal Rant: If wealth is a blessing then does this mean God curses or hates 2/3 of the world's population? Wow, in all my readings of the New Testament the only thing Jesus promises us is a cross! I am not surprised that such preachers are in front of mega-sized congregations. Who wants to hear about suffering for what you believe? No one! Yet, a faith that suffers nothing is also worth nothing! So consider the comforts we enjoy each day and the suffering we avoid. Consider also that the world is so interconnected that my comfort may cause others to suffer. To do this try this thought exercise: Add up the cost of all the clothes you have on while you're reading this blog. Take that sum and then visit any grocery store webpage that allows for online shopping (Lowe's Food offers this service) and see how much food you can buy for that sum and then consider how many people with no clothes on their back that could feed.

Wednesday, May 24, 2006

Gathering for May 28


There was a flood...no, a hurricane...no, a swarm of locusts, or was it just another class that needed a teacher? OK, it was the latter, so please accept my apologies for combining our class with the Faith & Friendship class on such short notice (short notice meaning the last-minute-sticky-note on the door of our class). To spark some discussion this week visit National Public Radio's "Speaking of Faith" website for a conversation on creeds called Need for Creeds. Download it as a podcast! Listen to it online! It talks about why we have creeds. Last week I mentioned the Nicene Creed, of recent Da Vinci Code fame, and "Need for Creeds" talks about this creed (as well as offering some notes on the Apostles' Creed). One of the interesting points that comes out of the discussion (at least for me) is the fact that there are so few creeds in Judaism (the Shema, "Hear, O Israel, the Lord your God is one God") and Islam (There is no deity worthy of worship other than God [Allah] and Muhammad is the messenger of God [Allah]."), but that there are so many in Christianity. Why is this? Furthermore, the majority of lines in most of our creeds are devoted to detailing the identity of Jesus. Why is this? Oh yeah, here is a link to this week's reading. The image posted with this week's entry is an illuminated version of the Nicene Creed (this one is in Latin, but you can read it in English any Sunday in our Hymnal...it is #880)

Saturday, May 13, 2006

Gathering on May 21


A panda walks into a café. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air. "Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes towards the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder. "I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up." The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation. "Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves." So punctuation really does matter, even if it is only occasionally a matter of life and death. (This story is from Lynne Truss' book Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation.)
The wrong turn of a phrase may seem like nothing to get upset over. Yet, with theology it can be a matter of life or death. Especially, when we are talking about our understanding of Jesus. The Nicene Creed (THE Early Church's expression of belief) states this about Jesus, "We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, eternally begotten of the Father, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, of one Being with the Father. Through him all things were made. For us and for our salvation he came down from heaven: by the power of the Holy Spirit he became incarnate from the Virgin Mary, and was made man." Two things jump out. One, Jesus is fully God. Two, Jesus is fully human. How can this be? I don't know. However, remember that theology is our embracing a mystery! Why all this concern that we get it straight in our heads that Jesus was fully human and fully God? To think otherwise would be a heresy, and most of the Church's heresies are connected to a misunderstanding of Christ's nature.
If Jesus is not begotten meaning he was made or created then there was a time when Jesus was not. He cannot be God because God is without beginning or ending. If he is not God then he cannot save us! Even if we lived without sin, that would be us only doing our duty to God. What could we do to repay the offense of sinning in the first place? Only God could go beyond the call of duty. However, God didn't owe the debt, humanity did...so humanity had to repay it! Ah-ha, what we need is a God-Man! Jesus. If he was not human he could not save us! (The Church didn't just invent this God-Man notion, it is in the Scriptures.) For an even more detailed explanation, click here.

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

Thoughts for Sunday May 14

Shame on you if you're reading this and thinking, "oh man, thats this Sunday!" Well...it is...this Sunday is Mother's day. It is Tuesday...you've got four shopping days left! Get to it or otherwise you'll hear, "and to think I was in labor with you for [insert ridiculous number of hours here]!" OK with reminders given it is time to turn our attention to Sunday's Gathering and Discussion. Last Sunday we got wonderfully off-topic. (It is amazing how, to loosely quote Robert Burns, "the best laid plans of mice and men often [get scuttled by the Holy Spirit].) We discussed in detail debunking the Da Vinci Code. (You'll see a blog entry with a few links you can hit and draw your own conclusions.) This week, start by looking at the entry for May 7. We are discussing "...and in Jesus Christ." For this week's reading, click HERE.
Thoughts/Questions for Discussion:
  • Though Jesus never wrote a word (that we are aware of) you could fill a library with books about him. Why is he so controversial? Why is he one of the most discussed and debated figures in human history?
  • Why could it be said that Jesus is the "scandal of scripture?" Well, it is because we say that we believe that he was both completely "human" and "divine." Why can't Jesus just be one or the other? Why can't he be half and half? By the way, most all heresies are over this issue of Jesus being both man and God. (Here is a hint for approaching this question.)
  • OK, if you looked at last week's blog entry, why didn't God just send "Super Jesus?"

Thursday, May 04, 2006

Da Vinci Debunked!


Da Vinci Code Debunked!
...of course, I'm a Pastor...so...I guess that makes me part of the conspiracy?
  • This link is to a review and some thoughts by Dr. James Howell, he authored the book we are using in our Sunday gatherings.
  • This link is to a debate between Dr. Bart Ehrman (of recent Gospel of Judas fame) and Dr. Richard Hays held at Duke University.

Thoughts for Sunday May 7

The most profound theological questions always seem to come from children. I suspect it is because they, unlike most adults, search for answers without ever thinking "is it O.K. for me to even ask this?" For example, a child in one of my former churches asked me, "why didn't Jesus just come down here...and be all like, 'you all best believe in my Dad, or I'll break out some karate moves...'" The kid then proceded to go all "Chuck Norris" around me before adding, "Jesus could have been like all big and bad (at this point I am thinking that this kid must have seen the same 900 Foot Jesus that Oral Roberts claimed to see), he could have shot laser beams out of his eyes..." The kid went on for sometime, all the while making Jesus sound more like something out of a Wachowski Brothers film than the Messiah of Scripture.
Super Jesus seems to make sense upon first thought. Yet, Jesus came into the world the same way you and I did. Yet, Jesus ate with outcasts, sided with sinners, and paired himself with the poor. Yet, Jesus had no army, just a few followers. Yet, Jesus led no revolt, but died as an enemy of the State. Yet, 2000 plus years later I am blogging about the Beloved. Why? This is the main question I want us to consider for Sunday. The miracles detailed in the Bible aside, why didn't God just send us a Super Jesus?

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Thoughts for Sunday April 30


Thomas Aquinas, one of the most prolific theological minds of any age, once said that Theology was the Queen of the Sciences. Last week I asked what is or what should be the relationship between Science and Faith. A few weeks ago on National Public Radio's Speaking of Faith there was a discussion with John Polkinghorne, "Quarks & Creation", that sheds considerable light on what that realationship might look like. Polkinghorne is both a Theologian and a Physicist. In his conversation with NPR he handles the doctrine of Creation as both a faithful Christian and a responsible Scientist. Not only does he touch on the relationship between Science and Faith, he also addresses the question, the "why," that is being answered in Gensis 1.
On to this week, where we are all about praise. The Westminster Shorter Catechesim asks "What is the chief end of man?" and answers, "...to glorify God, and to enjoy him forever." In otherwords, we were created for worship and praise. The David Crowder Band on their new album, "A Collision," has this song You Are My Joy (Track 15). I found it to be a wonderful expression of what we might say when we find ourselves in "slack-jawed" awe of the Creator of Heaven and Earth. Praise is losing yourself in the greatness of God. Again, this week we are all about praise, we are all about losing ouselves in God. Here is this week's reading.
Thoughts/Questions for this Week:
1.) What are some moments or experiences where you found yourself to be in "slack-jawed" awe of God?
2.) Theology must find expression in our actions, so what would our lives (i.e., our actions, priorities, thinking, etc.) look like if we took seriously that all we have is a gift from God?
3.) What is heaven? Is it just a reward for a life well lived? Is it a destination or a journey? If heaven is the Kingdom of God then are we it's subjects, and if so how should a proper subject behave?

Wednesday, April 19, 2006

Thoughts for Sunday April 23


"God sat down on the side of a hill where he could think. God thought and he thought until he thought, "I'll make me a man." Up from the bed of the river God scooped the clay, and by the bank of the river God kneeled him down and there the great God Almighty who lit the sun and fixed it in the sky, who flung the stars to the most far corner of the night, who rounded the earth in the middle of his hand, this great God like a mammy bending over her baby kneeled down in the dust, toiling over a lump of clay till he shaped it in his own image. Then into it he blew the breath of life and the man became a living sould." (from the poem The Creation by
James Weldon Johnson) Art offers us the best language with which to depict God. Maybe, art is the language of God the Creator. Johnson's poem happens to be one of my favorite narrations of the Creation story and offers an image of God that is the perfect marriage of God's parental nature, almighty attributes, and position as creator in one vivid poem. (Before I forget, here is a link to this week's reading.)
Thoughts & Questions to Consider/Comment on:
  • I believe that asking better questions leads to gaining a more faithful understanding of any subject, God included. So, what question is Genesis 1 (and following) seeking to answer (Who, what, when, where, why, and/or how)?
  • Thomas Aquinas stated that theology was the Queen of the Sciences. What is and what should be the relationship between science and faith? How does "science" impact "faith?"
  • Why did God create us? What is our role in creation? What makes us special (or are we)?

Wednesday, April 12, 2006

Thoughts for Sunday April 16


To paraphrase Jean Jacques Maritain in his work "Art and Scholasticism", "We are created in the image of God; God is a God of creation. Thus, when we create we are imitating God. Art is therefore the highest thing we can do as humans because we are imitating our Creator." (This week's paraphrasing brought to you by the number 7, the letter Q, and, mainly, Alan Combs.) As we continue discussing God "the Father Almighty" and as we look to next week's discussion of God as Creator, it occurs to me that in our trying to understand and embrace the mystery that is God, art is the best language we can use when describing God. This week I challenge us to post links to examples of art (e.g., lyrics to a song, lines from a poem, scenes in a play, paintings, photos, sculpture...any medium is acceptable) that expresses something of the nature and identity of God. To start us off, the picture on the left is by Rembrandt and is discussed in this week's reading. (Oh yeah, here is a link to this week's Reading.) The painting is Rembrandt trying to capture the scene between the Prodigal Son and his Father.

Wednesday, April 05, 2006

Thoughts for Sunday April 9


"I believe in God the Father Almighty..." I am not sure which description of the nature of God troubles me more, the Father or the Almighty. For many people, knowing God as father evokes pleasant memories of Dear Old Dad. Yet, for some people if God is a father then God might be understood to be distant, harsh, or even neglectful. I realize that we must distinguish between our earthly fathers and our Heavenly Father, but one's experience of their earthly father could influence their understanding of their Heavenly Father. The second description of God is that God is almighty. For me, the word "almighty" seems to chase away any notions of intimacy. I mean can you really embrace something that is all-mighty?

Questions/Thoughts for this Sunday's Reading:
1.) How are we to understand the "Almighty" nature of God while still enjoying intimacy and closeness with God?
2.) How does our knowing God as Father and as Almighty allow God to be all-powerful while maintaining the intimacy and closeness a child would enjoy with his/her father?
3.) What is lost if we do not know God as "All-Mighty?" If God wasn't "All-Mighty" would that entity still be God? Would that entity still be worthy of our worship?
4.) If God is "All-Mighty" then why is there so much suffering and evil in this world? (We will return to this subject later, but you can start posting some questions/thoughts.)
5.) Do you have issues with God being called father due to your experiences with an earthly father?
6.) What is gained by understanding God as "mother?" What is sacrificed when we only understand God in masculine terms? Or is the whole discussion of mascuilne and femmine images for God unnecessary or unimportant since God is beyond gender?

Monday, March 27, 2006

Links on the Left

A quick note gang...the links on the left, literally, have a new addition. It is a link to American Public Radio (don't snooze on this one) to their "Speaking of Faith" program. The website has a wealth of info. on thinkers and thoughts from our Christian faith as well as from other world religions.

Thoughts for Sunday April 2nd

Kelly, Ruben, Fantasia...the American Idols. I can't say that I am a huge "idol" fan, though I do like watching the early rounds where every other "hopeful" resembles a "patient on a day pass" more than a "pop star!" American Idols? Who or what are America's greatest idols? (As Americans, what is your greatest idol?) This week we are discussing the first line of the Creed, "I believe in God." The first question I think of when I say that line is who is God? Don't overlook this question. It is important! Martin Luther once said that what our heart most wants to cling to is our god. John Calvin went one step further saying that the human heart is a factory for idols...a factory for gods. Click here for this week's reading.Thoughts & Questions for this week's gathering/online discussion: (Comment or add further questions to those I posted below)
  • God is a "We." In other words, we will start to talk about the Trinity (God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit).
  • Who/what are our gods, our idols?
  • When you say the word "God," what do you think about? What images come to mind?
  • How do we know about God?
  • What are some ways we can convince others of the presence of God?

Thursday, March 23, 2006

Thoughts for Sunday March 26th


A Thought Exercise: Imagine you're docking a boat. You cast a rope to tie your boat to the dock. Success, you now begin to pull the boat to the shore. Now, ask yourself, are you pulling the boat closer to the shore (i.e., the dock) or are you moving the entire shore closer to the boat? Obviously, the boat is the one moving, not the shore. Faith works the same way! As we pray we find ourselves moving closer to God, God stays God. In other words, God does not become the sum total of all our opinions. God remains God and we draw ourselves closer to God and God's will. C.S. Lewis, when praying for his wife who was dying of cancer, discovered that when he first started to pray for his wife he was praying as if to change God's will. Later, he discovered that in prayer it was not God's will that was being changed so much as his. This exercise brings us into Howell's Lesson for this week, how faith is both personal and communal.

  • In what ways can the Creed be (or become) impersonal and in what ways is it deeply personal (i.e., it expresses my beliefs, it expresses my relationship with God)?
  • Is there a danger in making faith (what we say we believe when reciting the Creed) too personal? In other words, can you have too personal a relationship with Jesus?
  • Howell argues that we live in a culture that is suspicious of truth, I would add especially absolute truths, is this a fair assessment? If it is, then how might the Creed be received by our current culture, how might faith be received? Does our believing in absolute truths make us somewhat counter-culture as Christians? If it does, what are some examples?
  • What is the role of the Church (the community of believers) in helping us to believe?

Closing Thought: Remember the Creeds came to be through debate, discussion, prayer and thought. Remember that the Creeds were first recited and professed under penalty of death. Though we may be tempted to think of them as just something we say each Sunday, the first people who said them would have said them with greater passion and conviction. Just think if in this class we can rediscover something of the passion and conviction of our spiritual-forebearers.

Thursday, March 16, 2006

Thoughts for Sunday March 19th


This week's lesson is "A Summary of the Bible Story." Howell makes the argument that the Creed is a short-hand, a condensed version, "Cliff Notes," if you will, for the Bible. (The Bible is some 1,189 chapters and 31,000-plus verses...thank goodness for Cliff Notes, thank goodness for the Creed.) My question to you all this week is do you agree with his argument that the Creed functions as a sort of "Cliff Notes?" If not, then what parts of Scripture fall outside the scope of the Creed? What are the benefits of this "Cliff Notes" function of the Creed? What are the dangers in just reading the "Cliff Notes," in just reading the Creed?

Monday, March 06, 2006

What is Theology?


What is theology? I know that I keep throwing this word around and have not really offered a definition. If we break down the word itself, "Theos," meaning "God," and "logos," meaning "word," we come to a sort of definition. Theology is a word about God. Theology is a word from God. All theology is the result of our reflecting on something God chose to reveal about God's self. Thelogy is a word from God, like the Bible, the incarnation (the word from God, in John 1) of God in the person of Jesus, and preaching. Theology is our word back to God like in praise, prayer, and worship. Finally, theology is a word about God, like our confessing our faith or witnessing to our faith through our words and actions. This week we also use the word "dogma." Dogma, not the irreverent, poignant, and funny movie by Kevin Smith (go Jay & Silent Bob), but those things we consider to be the "core" of our Christian faith. Dogma is connected to doctrine, the official teachings of the church. Theology then is our individual or group reflection on our Christian faith...we use dogma and doctrine as a road map to discerning the "words" we will offer about God.

Sunday School for March 12, 2006


To have a look-see at the reading for this week (06.12.2006) just click HERE. Dr. Howell opens with a verse from Mark’s gospel (Mark 9: 32) where the disciples have witnessed Jesus cast an evil spirit out of a boy and later foretells his coming betrayal, death and resurrection. Yet, earlier in the passage the boy's father offers the best for us budding theologians to say to ourselves over and over again…to pray…to chant…to keep in mind so as to posture ourselves correctly before our Lord…he says, “I believe, help my unbelief.” Powerful! I believe, yet I recognize that my belief is nothing without help from the Almighty. Theology, unlike any other thing we can study does not allow us to remain detached from our subject. If we detach from God, the object of our studying (I prefer the word “seeking” or even "loving" to the word “studying”) we are doing little more than sociology or philosophy of religion, but not theology. This brings us to this week’s lesson, “Doubt & Dogma.”

“But what if we have doubts and hard questions? Does the Apostles’ Creed alienate thinkers? The Creed in a surprising way, invites doubt…. Isn’t there a faithfulness in our doubting? Haven’t all great discoveries in history happened because somebody doubted?”
· Consider the questions Howell poses in the above excerpt.
· What is the relationship between faith and doubt? (For those of you who were in our first class back in February you may remember me mentioning something about the theologian Paul Tillich. I’ll share some more on him this week, specifically his book Dynamics of Faith.)
· Where does one draw the line between “healthy skepticism or doubts” and “unbelieving?” Can such a line even be drawn?
· What are your greatest sources of doubt?
· “I believe, Lord help my unbelief.” This line makes for an awesome prayer. Theologians have talked for ages about a “faith that we believe” and the “faith that it takes to believe it.” What are your thoughts on making a distinction between a belief and the strength it takes to believe it?

When I read Howell’s second paragraph, I came up with the following questions/comments:
· How does the Creed function as a frame through which we can then ask questions about God? More importantly, how does it help our forming answers?
· God is mystery. Think about it, God is greater than our minds can conceive. Our knowing God, the infinite and almighty, is like our trying to carry the oceans of the world in a shot glass…you’ll get something in there, but never all of it. Yet, God invites us to embrace this mystery and we are embraced by the mystery…by God. Should this fact cause us not to want to study God? If God is a subject we cannot master (say like carpentry) then is our studying God something like a doctor or lawyer “practicing” medicine or law? (They practice to know the subject better, but they never master it.) Is theology then more like a marriage (us to God, appreciating that God knows us far more than we know God) in that the longer we stay in the relationship the more we come to know the object of our love?
· One of the footnotes (for those of you with the book) for this section offers this quote, “those who believe they believe in God, but without passion in the heart, without anguish of mind, without uncertainty, without doubt, and even without despair believe only in the idea of God, not in God himself.” Wow! What are your thoughts on this quote, how is studying theology, studying God, a discipline (I chose this word intentionally) unlike anything else one could study (again, I prefer the word “seek” or “seeking”) because it demands so much of us?

“Can anyone prove there is a God? What about science and the Bible? How can God be good if there is evil? Why call God “Father?” Does it matter if Mary was a virgin?”
· What are the questions that cause you the most doubt about your faith?
· What questions do you want considered during our time together each Sunday?

“We may all know fervent Christians bristling with faith who say, ‘Just give me Jesus.’ But the Creed not only gives us Jesus. In Rowan Williams’ lovely words, it is ‘the job of doctrine…to hold us still before the name of Jesus. When that slips out of view, we begin instead to use this language to defend ourselves, to denigrate others, to control and correct—and then it becomes a problem.’”
· When I say the word “fundamentalism” or “fundamentalist” what do you think it means? What thoughts or images spring to mind? Now, what if I argued that fundamentalism is faith without doubt what would you say in response? (I admit that this question reveals that I think faith is never an absence of doubt.)
· What problems result from fundamentalism? (Note: I am not talking about the on-going debate between liberalism and conservatism; you can be either and still be fundamentalist!)

Howell quotes Dorothy Sayers who said “It is worse than useless for Christians to talk about the importance of Christian morality, unless they are prepared to take their stand upon the fundamentals of Christian theology. It is fatal to let people suppose that Christianity is only a mode of feeling…And it is fatal to imagine that everybody knows quite well what Christianity is and needs only a little encouragement to practice it. The brutal fact is that in this Christian country not one person in a hundred has the faintest notion what the Church teaches about God or man or society or the person of Jesus Christ.”
· Is it the case that increasingly people know less and less about what it means to be a Christian? (I ask this wanting us to consider ourselves, those who are a part of the church.) A great many things have and are being done in the name of Christ…I wonder if Christ would want his name attached to all those things?
· How are our beliefs and our actions connected?
· How is theology more than a matter of the head?To stir the proverbial pot, is being a faithful Christian always going to give others the perception that you’re a loyal citizen?

Again, feel free to post your own questions and comments on this week's reading or any of the previous weeks' readings. Cheers, Pastor Chris

Monday, February 27, 2006

Meet a Theologian


Hey Gang,
As we talk about theology, our thoughts on God. I want to throughout our journey introduce you to various theologians (those people, like you and me) who have spoken about and acted for God. The men and women I hope to introduce you to are our forebearers in the faith. For the month of March, I am starting with the theologian that I read the most back in my Duke days and am influenced by the most...Dietrich Bonhoeffer. The link on the left is to a webpage that offers articles, photos, and even a sound-byte on his life and thought. Bonhoeffer was a pastor, theologian, pacifist, and activist in Nazi Germany. He had an amazing, though tragically short, life and offered some of the most profound thoughts about God! Consider the link an introduction. Read as much of as little as you like.
Cheers,
Pastor Chris

Sunday School for March 5, 2006

"Growing into our Convictions"

Over the last two weeks, we talked about the connection between faith and doubt. I suggested that the greater a person’s faith is, the greater his/her doubt will be. Think about it, only Christians stay up at night worrying about whether or not God exists. Atheists, on the other-hand, don’t lose much sleep considering the matter. We also discussed that what we say we believe, our faith, takes faith, effort or strength, to believe it. Finally, we discussed that our theology (thoughts about God) must be more than something in our heads, it must be something that we can be seen in our lives or actions.

On to this week: When I first shared the vision of my teaching a Young Adults' Sunday school class, people asked what I would teach. At first, I thought, "well...I might adapt some of my youth Bible studies.” Thankfully, I kept thinking. After all, its not like you're not youth anymore! Next, I thought about teaching a book in the Bible. Later, I considered talking about current events. I even considered simply fielding you're questions each week. Finally, it hit me or rather God hit me (not literally, God had a thing for smiting people back in the Old Testament, but I am talking here about revelation) that I didn't need to teach anyone about a book or a topic. What I needed to do was to give others the tools to study for themselves...to think theologically. Therein lays the philosophy for this class or at least my approach. That being said, the question remained how one teaches people to think theologically. Well, you're adults...so there is no need to feed you baby food...you're more than ready for something more solid. So...I decided that at the start of this class I would teach you to think theologically the same way I was taught…back when I was at Duke...using the creeds of the church.

This week's lesson; from The Life We Claim: The Apostles' Creed for Preaching, Teaching, and Worship by Dr. James C. Howell. To purchase the book, click here.

Questions for Discussion:

Why study this Creed, why not another one?

Creeds are those things we say each Sunday. We print them in the bulletin. They are even in our hymnals. Yet, do we ever stop to consider that those words represent and remind us of who we are as Christians and what it is that we say we believe? Do we ever stop and think, "Hey, what do all these words mean?" What is so important about us knowing the meaning of these words? Share an experience of when you might have had one of these thoughts. (Note: You can share these questions with our group by email or on our blog site. I want your questions so I can respond to them as we go.)

Why was the Apostles Creed even written? For that matter, why was any creed written?

Is our faith (our beliefs) an inheritance (something we receive from others) or a treasure (something we ourselves discovered) or both?

Some would argue that increasingly people are interested in traditions or our connection to the past. Still, others would have you believe that you shouldn't trust traditions. So, who is right? Where do you stand on the issue of tradition?

What are some benefits of tradition? What are some drawbacks?

By even saying the creed how are we becoming part of something greater than us?

L. Gregory Jones (Dean of Duke Divinity School) once said in a lecture, "Tradition is the living faith of the dead, traditionalism is the dead faith of the living." What are your thoughts on this quote?

Howell talks in this week's lesson about how the Apostles' Creed was used as a sort of Q&A for those coming into the faith. A creed (from the Latin word credo, meaning “I believe") is a statement of what a person or group believes. So, is a creed, such as the Apostles' Creed, providing a boundary for beliefs (i.e., that which can be said and you still be considered a Christian) or is it a barrier (i.e., if you don't say this you're not a Christian)?

"'I believe' is not the same as saying 'I feel' or 'I want' or 'I think,'" how is this true?

Nicholas Lash wrote that "I believe" is the same as saying "I promise." When we say "I believe" we are not saying "It is my opinion." No, we are saying that this is true; I promise that I believe this. Share your thoughts on this statement?

There have been Pagan cults and religions throughout history, not one has a creed! Why is this? Why was it then so important for the Church to have their act together, in other words, to state what they believed?

What does it say about the Church's care for the truth? What is gained by having a core set of beliefs or a standard? What is the danger in not having a core set of beliefs or a standard?

You will find in studying the Apostles’ Creed, or any creed, that words are very important. Nowadays, we seldom consider the power of words, and about how they form and shape our thinking. (Philosophers have put forward that words are the handles we use to grab hold of ideas.) Let me offer a thought-exercise on how words shape our understanding. To be less controversial, I will use pandas instead of God. Lynne Truss, writer of the British runaway best-seller Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation, offers this reflection on our understanding of pandas. “A panda eats shoots and leaves.” This sentence causes us to think of the adorable panda eating his daily diet of bamboo shoots and leaves. Now, if we change our wording to, “a panda eats, shoots, and leaves,” we get a very different image of pandas. Now, the lovable giant is the rudest of dinner guests, he shows up to eat, then shoots and then flees the scene of the crime. Words are important because they shape our perception. I am not so much asking a question here, as making a point for us to remember as we go forward.

People were killed for saying they believed the claims of the Apostles' Creed. Are there things in your life that you believe so strongly in that you are willing to die for it? We are not likely to die literally for our beliefs. However, do we in some sense die (i.e., metaphorically) or suffer for what we believe? Having asked this, do we actually suffer or die for what we believe? Would we?

I also want to encourage you to post your own questions from this week's reading. The earlier in the week you do this the better chance I have to consider it and respond to it. For that matter, the earlier you post the better chance all of us have to consider and respond. Oh yeah, if you have questions about this week’s questions post those too?

Friday, February 24, 2006


Our Discussion for this Sunday is prompted by Bono (Lead Singer of U2, activist, etc.) who gave this sermon at the National Prayer Breakfast. The following link is to a transcript and CSPAN video of his message (click here). Below are some discussion questions to provoke thoughts and comments, both for this Sunday and the week to come.
Last week to this week: As a class, we are building towards a discussion of what it is that we, as Christians, believe? Ours is a discussion of Theology (i.e., thoughts about God). (Later, we will be using the Apostles' Creed as a means to enter into this discussion.) Last week we spoke about the relationship between doubt and faith. We discussed that doubt and faith are connected. We went so far to say that the greater one's faith, the greater one's doubt. We also talked about sources of truth or how we knew something was true. This led into a discussion about how our ways of knowing about God are not unlike our ways of knowing anything else.
With that said, this week we need to talk about action! Theology or the thinking about God has to be more than a thing in our "head." Christianity (our believing in God) has to be more than in our heads and hearts, but must be in our actions. This brings me to why we're using Bono's message for our class this week. I want to discuss not only the points he brings up, but how a proper understanding of God (a proper theology) must be one in which a person's thoughts moves them to action.
Questions to Consider:
Bono: "Well, I'm the first to admit that there's something unnatural… something unseemly… about rock stars mounting the pulpit and preaching at presidents, and then disappearing to their villas in the South of France. Talk about a fish out of water. It was weird enough when Jesse Helms showed up at a U2 concert… but this is really weird, isn't it?"
  • Why is it that a Rock Star and not a Reverend is having to speak the truth about God? Why is the Church not challenging the nation with this message? How is this a reflection of a theology of the mind, but not one of action? How has the Church got itself into the situation where Rock Stars instead of Reverends are the ones preaching such messages? How do we get ourselves out of this situation? (HINT: Again, I want us to see that a proper theology is a mindset that moves us to action)

Bono: "Yes, it's odd, having a rock star here—but maybe it's odder for me than for you. You see, I avoided religious people most of my life. Maybe it had something to do with having a father who was Protestant and a mother who was Catholic in a country where the line between the two was, quite literally, a battle line. Where the line between church and state was… well, a little blurry, and hard to see. I remember how my mother would bring us to chapel on Sundays… and my father used to wait outside. One of the things that I picked up from my father and my mother was the sense that religion often gets in the way of God. For me, at least, it got in the way. Seeing what religious people, in the name of God, did to my native land… and in this country, seeing God's second-hand car salesmen on the cable TV channels, offering indulgences for cash… in fact, all over the world, seeing the self-righteousness roll down like a mighty stream from certain corners of the religious establishment… I must confess, I changed the channel. I wanted my MTV."

  • Is it true that more people would love Christ if it were not for the Christians? Share some examples of how this is true (Bono hints at some in these lines). Again, how is theology part of the problem (HINT: confessing one thing with our lips, and acting contrary to it)? What is gained when theology matches practice?
  • Extra credit: what line in the above is borrowing from Martin Luther King (another example of theology that matched action).

Bono: "Then, in 1997, a couple of eccentric, septuagenarian British Christians went and ruined my shtick—my reproachfulness. They did it by describing the Millennium, the year 2000, as a Jubilee year, as an opportunity to cancel the chronic debts of the world's poorest people. They had the audacity to renew the Lord's call—and were joined by Pope John Paul II, who, from an Irish half-Catholic's point of view, may have had a more direct line to the Almighty. 'Jubilee'—why 'Jubilee'? What was this year of Jubilee, this year of our Lords favor? I'd always read the Scriptures, even the obscure stuff. There it was in Leviticus (25:35)… 'If your brother becomes poor,' the Scriptures say, 'and cannot maintain himself… you shall maintain him… You shall not lend him your money at interest, not give him your food for profit.' It is such an important idea, Jubilee, that Jesus begins his ministry with this. Jesus is a young man, he's met with the rabbis, impressed everyone, people are talking. The elders say, he's a clever guy, this Jesus, but he hasn't done much… yet. He hasn't spoken in public before… When he does, is first words are from Isaiah: 'The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,' he says, 'because He has anointed me to preach good news to the poor.' And Jesus proclaims the year of the Lord's favour, the year of Jubilee. (Luke 4:18) What he was really talking about was an era of grace—and we're still in it. So fast-forward 2,000 years. That same thought, grace, was made incarnate—in a movement of all kinds of people. It wasn't a bless-me club… it wasn't a holy huddle. These religious guys were willing to get out in the streets, get their boots dirty, wave the placards, follow their convictions with actions… making it really hard for people like me to keep their distance. It was amazing. I almost started to like these church people. "

  • The Church originally was a group of people that acted on their beliefs drawing those beliefs from the example and guidance of Scripture. (Early on, theology was expressed in deeds and only later words.) So, if we are taking God seriously, and God's word seriously, how would life and the world be different? How would the church be different?
  • The idea of Jubilee, that Bono expands upon in this message, is just one example of the Church making a "difference" in the world, of the Church turning the world on its ear by taking theology seriously. What are some other instances of the Church, both locally and globally, taking theology seriously? (HINTS: Civil Rights Movement, Katrina Aid, etc. Of course, you can site the other examples Bono offers.)

Bono: "Preventing the poorest of the poor from selling their products while we sing the virtues of the free market… that's a justice issue. Holding children to ransom for the debts of their grandparents… That's a justice issue. Withholding life-saving medicines out of deference to the Office of Patents… that's a justice issue. And while the law is what we say it is, God is not silent on the subject. That's why I say there's the law of the land… and then there is a higher standard. There's the law of the land, and we can hire experts to write them so they benefit us, so the laws say it's OK to protect our agriculture but it's not OK for African farmers to do the same, to earn a living? As the laws of man are written, that's what they say. God will not accept that. Preventing the poorest of the poor from selling their products while we sing the virtues of the free market… that's a justice issue. Holding children to ransom for the debts of their grandparents… That's a justice issue. Withholding life-saving medicines out of deference to the Office of Patents… that's a justice issue. And while the law is what we say it is, God is not silent on the subject. That's why I say there's the law of the land… and then there is a higher standard. There's the law of the land, and we can hire experts to write them so they benefit us, so the laws say it's OK to protect our agriculture but it's not OK for African farmers to do the same, to earn a living? As the laws of man are written, that's what they say. God will not accept that. Mine won't, at least. Will yours?"

  • Who is God? Seems like a simple question, but who you think God is may not be who you follow? Maybe the question should be posed, "who is God, or Lord, of you?"
  • Do you ever think that some people (including us at times) make God sound a lot like their own biases, prejudices and ideas? God is no longer a voice speaking to and with us, but an echo of us. How has the Church, the government, institutions in general distorted God to fit their own agendas? How have we done the same? As an aside, notice how theology (what we believe) and ethics (how we apply those beliefs) are linked.

Bono: "Thus sayeth the Lord: 'Bring the homeless poor into the house, when you see the naked, cover him, then your light will break out like the dawn and your recovery will speedily spring fourth, then your Lord will be your rear guard.' The Jewish scripture says that. Isaiah 58 again. That is a powerful incentive: 'The Lord will watch your back.' Sounds like a good deal to me, right now. A number of years ago, I met a wise man who changed my life. In countless ways, large and small, I was always seeking the Lord's blessing. I was saying, you know, I have a new song, look after it… I have a family, please look after them… I have this crazy idea… And this wise man said: stop. He said, stop asking God to bless what you're doing. Get involved in what God is doing—because it's already blessed. Well, God, as I said, is with the poor. That, I believe, is what God is doing. And that is what He's calling us to do.

  • Christ said that the greatest commandment was to love God and to love others...theology in a nutshell! How are these two connected? Who are these others? How are our thoughts about God (our theology) also thoughts about others? Theology is not about us (in a self-centered sense), it is about us properly understanding how to be involved with others.

Bono: "History, like God, is watching what we do. "

Obviously, this passage raises other questions, thoughts, and comments. This is why this is a place to communicate. Please feel free to share your thoughts both before class (so we can discuss them Sunday, afterall this is a class by you all, not just me) and throughout the coming week. Remember, this is a site for Koinonia (pronounced: coin-no-knee-uh), a site for commuity and communication with each other and, ultimately, with God.

Greetings and Salutations! Ok...enough formality. The picture is from the National Youth Workers Convention in Charlotte several years ago...I am the one on the left. This blog is a space for us to be engage in Koinonia...to be a community and to communicate. It is a space for us to share our wonderings about God and our wanderings with God. Check back for links and discussion questions for our upcoming Sunday School gathering. Cheers, ChrisPosted by Picasa